Welcome to this first episode of The Collective Podcast! Here, Drs. Rosa and Corrales discuss the impact of framing a message that elicits support and action in reform.

🎧 Core Audience

  • Science educators, researchers, and policymakers who are interested in improving science education through effective communication and framing of messages.
  • Individuals seeking insights on how to craft compelling arguments and messages that resonate with diverse audiences.
  • Anyone interested in the intersection of science education, communication, and social change.

📋 Topics Covered

  • The importance of effective framing in advancing science education reforms.
  • The challenges of framing messages for impact in academic publishing and the tension between values and success metrics.
  • There is a need to balance empathy, interdependence, and self-interest when framing messages.
  • The importance of considering the intended audience and tailoring messages accordingly.
  • The role of authenticity and values alignment ineffective framing.

🗝️ Key Takeaways

  1. Empathy alone may not be enough: While empathy is crucial in understanding the experiences of marginalized groups, it may not be the most effective framing strategy for promoting change.
  2. Interdependence and self-interest: Framing messages around interdependence and self-interest can more effectively garner support for reforms. Emphasize how addressing inequities benefits everyone, not just the marginalized groups directly affected.
  3. Accessible language and practical solutions: Use clear and accessible language to communicate research findings and recommendations. Provide concrete examples and practical solutions that educators can quickly implement.
  4. Target the right audience: Consider your intended audience when framing your message. Tailor your language and examples to resonate with the specific group you're trying to reach.
  5. Authenticity and values alignment: Be authentic in your framing and ensure it aligns with your values and beliefs. Avoid diluting your message to appease reviewers or conform to norms.

📄 Useful Resources

  1. Here’s the TEDx video by Dr. Nat Kendall-Taylor:
  1. We found the study referenced in the TEDx video; here’s how they defined interdependence:
“Interdependence: the idea that everyone in the province has a stake in addressing addiction”

⌚️ Helpful Time Stamps:

00:00 - Opening

01:40 - Overview

05:05 - Three questions

05:47 - Question 1

11:24 - Successfully framing a research paper

14:44 - Framing equity reforms

22:34 - Should we avoid empathy?

34:28 - Question 2

49:34 - “We’re academics, of course we…”

52:16 - Academics vs. social media

58:53 - Question 3

🎙️ About the Hosts

Dr. Vanessa Rosa:

  • Advocate for science education reform and founder of Cuvette Collective.
  • Passionate about transforming science education and challenging academic conventions.
  • Expertise in science education research, curriculum development, and assessment.

Dr. Adri Corrales:

  • Education researcher, educator, and director of community engagement for Cuvette Collective.
  • Focus on equity and inclusion in science education.
  • Expertise in qualitative research methods and critical theory.

🙌🏽 Support the Podcast

If you found this content helpful, please consider subscribing to, sharing, and rating the podcast (buttons below).

Thank you for supporting efforts to advance science education reform and this community!