Do you take notes 📝, or do you build knowledge? 🧠

Apparently, there's a difference 🤯

I just learned and tried a system called zettelkasten 🗂️ (or "note box"), designed to support knowledge building over note-taking.

I hadn't considered how taking notes in notebooks, margins, or digital documents 📑 promotes linear thinking (this, then this).

Linear thinking limits how often you revisit your knowledge and engage in lateral thinking or combine old with new knowledge in engaging ways (this, to this).

Popularized by German sociologist and prolific researcher Niklas Luhmann, zettelkasten is about putting away the notebook in favor of index cards 🗂️, allowing you to cross-pollinate your ideas systematically.

The method involves taking three types of notes:

fleeting - random ideas,
literature - notes from what you read or heard and
permanent - a synthesized idea or insight.

The key is to write each of these notes in your own words and ensure they are independent (not needing other resources or context) and concise (3-5 sentences).

I've started building my digital zettelkasten in Craft (something similar could be done in Notion or Obsidian), linked here if you're curious:

Click to see a page from my zettlekasten.

💬

What do you think? Would you take (or have you taken) notes this way?

Next: The efficacy of a message 📤

Click to Access ➡️

About Cuvette Collective:

Cuvette Collective represents a community of educators and scientists dedicated to empowering the societal impact of STEM research.

We provide tailored tools, strategies, and insights to help scientists craft authentic, impactful broader impact plans that align with NSF priorities and their research focus.

Our engaging blog posts, interactive resources, and personalized consulting services support researchers in leveraging their scientific expertise to make a meaningful difference in society.